Tag: Reflection

  • Attrell Update – My Morning Routine

    Attrell Update – My Morning Routine


    Here’s my +Attrell Update for the week. I talk a little bit about advertising to different genders, especially in makeup and beauty products, and then I show off MY morning beauty routine.

    If you want to keep up with these videos, click on the “i” in the top right of the video and subscribe!

    Earlier this week, +Stephanie Attrell showed off her routine which was very enlightening and interesting to watch! Stay tuned for videos on her new makeup channel when she gets it running!

  • Windows 10 – A Better Way

    Windows 10 – A Better Way

    For those of you who love Windows as much as I do (I’m just a tech advocate, so I love pretty much all technology), you’re probably interested in hearing where Microsoft is going with the new version of Windows. I’m running Windows 8.1 right now, and in general, computer software versioning follows a fairly rigid convention. When you launch a version with a lot of major new features, you move to the next whole number (so the next version after 8.1 is logically 9). Most companies give their software code names, so between Windows 3.0 and Windows 7, they used names like Windows 95, 98, XP, ME, Vista, etc., but those versions also had official numbers internally between 3 and 7. This jump to Windows 10 (instead of 9) seems very arbitrary, and if you watch the video, they try to explain it, but to me it sounds like an arbitrary decision.
    One of the things that Apple has almost always been good at during product launches is making sure that they deliberately tell a story that makes sense within the context of the company, especially when it comes to naming their products. If there isn’t a linear succession of naming, there is a reason for it. So when this newest version of Windows was called Windows 10, I started thinking why that might be.
    This spring, at the Microsoft Build conference, Microsoft debuted some features that would be making it into the next version of Windows, including some updates to changes made between Windows 7 and 8 that many users found jarring. These changes were mostly seen as the company backpedalling on their Windows 8 vision with the tiled Start menu and touch-friendly controls. It was said that these updates would be coming in the fall, and most people sneered or derided the company for regressing in the look and feel of Windows.

    It’s not just me that thinks Joe Belfiore looks like Ed Norton, right?
    The new Windows 10 that was first unveiled yesterday is an early look at software that will be released to the public sometime in 2015. It would seem to me that internally, Windows 9 was deemed to not contain enough meaningful forward progress from Windows 8. From what I’ve seen, it mostly contained changes to placate enterprise users, as well as those who are still intent on running Windows XP in favour of learning the way a slightly different looking operating system might function. I’m not saying Windows 8 was perfect, but it certainly didn’t function THAT differently from Windows 7, and there were marked improvements made to the platform.

    So my thought is that Windows version 9 was named and tested extensively internally, but just wasn’t ever released to the public. The company wanted to really make sure they were making upgrades to the system that were simultaneously worthwhile to enterprise customers upgrading from XP or Windows 7 (let’s be honest, no enterprise updated to Windows Vista), while still appealing to Windows 8 customers who are familiar with the Metro interface. I think they have done that in Windows 10.
    I like what you’re doing, but the kerning on “10” is all wrong!

    Now, let’s get back to the story that Microsoft told yesterday about the name. They mentioned naming it Windows 9 as a successor to Windows 8, but hand-waved that away by saying it wasn’t something they wanted to do. Keep in mind that people were expecting a fully-functional operating system with this annual fall announcement, so it’s strange that we didn’t get that. Then they mentioned their lineup of products: Xbox One, OneDrive, OneNote, and said maybe they should call it Windows One. They then mentioned that it’s really too bad that name is already taken, showing a picture of Bill Gates holding an old Windows 1.0 floppy disk. They also mentioned the “giants that came before us”, but missed a major storytelling point in making the move to version 10. 

    In my vision of what Apple PR and execs would do in a situation like this (or really anybody in computer science would first think of in this situation), a compelling narrative would have been:

    We think Windows 1.0 was a huge step forward in the modern computing world, and we also think that the improvements and unification that we’ve built in to the next version of Windows are a whole order of magnitude better than the original version of Windows. 

    Then they could put up the Windows 1.0 text on the screen, animate the decimal to move one position to the right, and slowly fade it out.

    We’re taking Windows on every device to a whole new level, with Windows 10.

    This is a much more powerful and future-focused way of telling the story of Windows 10 than how it was done, and though I’m excited to try out Windows 10, I hope Microsoft know what they’re going to do to move the platform forward, if they can get enterprise customers to finally trust them again. 
  • Starting a Media Empire

    Starting a Media Empire

    This entry is not so much a gripe session as it is a telling of the story I’ve gone through in making digital entertainment and putting it on the Internet. We’ll call it part one of perhaps many:  

    VIDEOS

    I have been making videos and putting them on YouTube since around the beginning of 2013. It started out very simply, and I’ve been getting better and better as the technology and know-how in my life has very deliberately grown. I am now producing 2-3 videos a week for YouTube (usually 4-5 minutes each) on various channels. I have made music videos, done interviews, talked into a camera about myself or the things I’m interested in, it’s been really fun. The thing that I love most about YouTube is that it takes something REALLY hard (getting video onto the internet and then into the hands of literally billions of people) and removes absolutely all of the hard work from it. If you have a camera phone and the internet, you can create a video that has the potential to be seen by a billion people. YouTube does absolutely all of the heavy lifting for you. Yes, obviously you can put more work into the video itself, but that is the easy part of making a movie.   Distribution has been the hardest part of interpersonal communication since the dawn of time, and with the internet, and YouTube, we’ve absolutely cracked it. I can now chat in real-time with somebody across the world instantly, and when I post a video on YouTube, Australians can see it just as fast as Canadians can. It’s a beautiful service, and Google has taken huge steps towards making it even better since they bought the company in 2006. Getting your videos seen is absolutely another hard part of the process, but Google also takes lots of steps to help people like me get their videos seen, as I’ll get to later.

    AUDIO


    I made this video the day the podcast died (story below).

    I’ll call this entry podcasts, but really, as you’ll see, it is a LOT more complicated than YouTube is for videos. I first did what you’d really call a live video podcast (what I call a webcast) in February of 2014. Now, with the help of YouTube, Google+ and Hangouts on Air, doing that was very easy, simple, and trouble-free. Later, when I decided to take that video series and turn it into an audio-only podcast for people on the go, is when things started to go downhill fast. I now run 3 different podcasts (a feed of audio conversations with accompanying text descriptions that you can subscribe to, and find on a website on the internet) and they have mostly been a nightmare, logistically.   You see, there is no YouTube for podcasts. The great thing about YouTube is that it is absolutely free to use. Anybody on earth* can put up a video or series of videos, and everything just works. For podcasts, which are basically just videos but without the picture, things are almost infinitely more complicated unless you want to pay quite a bit. Logically, this doesn’t even make sense. Audio is about 1000x smaller** than video of a similar quality, and technically speaking, it doesn’t make much sense how expensive podcast storage is when YouTube is free.

    How YouTube Works

    It will probably help you to have a little backstory at this point. Every type of media has to be stored somewhere. Back before the Internet, they kept TV and movies on tapes and stored them for broadcast, distribution, and archiving. Like with tapes, you can’t just have a digital file living ON the internet, it has to be stored somewhere. Luckily for us, whereas you would have to go and get a tape from a storage locker, or Blockbuster, or your cabinet, when you have a digital file, you can store it digitally on a server (this serves files to you the same way a server at a restaurant would serve you your meal).

    So what YouTube does (and keep in mind that in 2014 they get about two hours of video uploaded every minute) is take your video, put it in storage, and keep it for you forever, for free. I don’t even really understand how this is possible, but that’s what they do. All the time, for the last 10 or so years. For free. They actually also take many steps to do things like stabilize shaky footage, fix things about your video, and store separate versions of your videos in HD and non-HD formats to play them on any phone, tablet, computer or TV as fast as possible.

    Not to mention that they also store copies of all of these files in multiple places around the world so everyone can access them quickly, and they cut all of your videos into short clips so that if your connection suddenly slows way down, the video won’t pause, it will just become a lower quality stream, and you don’t have to start the download over again. And it does all of that completely seamlessly. And again, it’s all FREE.

    How Podcasts Work

    So, back to podcasts. The majority of podcasts are between 20-100 MB (around 1 CD of music, for comparison), but no company has a really good free solution for hosting these files (hosting is the verb used for a server keeping your files for you; computer scientists are REALLY good at physical metaphors, seriously). I should point out that most podcasters do not make a lot of money, and so having a free solution to this problem (or at least a cheap one that actually works) would be super helpful.

    I will now chronicle for you the time I am having trying to host music files online, in the order I’ve been trying them. If you haven’t heard of any of these storage solutions, they are all very good in their own right, I will include links where I think it’s appropriate, although each different service seems to have its own reason why it just won’t work to host podcasts.

    First up, Dropbox. 

    I have been using Dropbox for a good 4-5 years at this point, and they’ve been really great to me in a lot of ways. I don’t really have to worry about losing any files to a computer crash anymore, because I just keep all of my files on Dropbox. They provide lots of storage for free, and give bonuses for being a student and for referring people to the service, they do a lot of good work. However, free accounts are limited to sharing only 20 GB of (hosted) files per day. This means that your typical podcast (~50 MB) would only need to be downloaded 400 times in a day before going over Dropbox’s limit (at which point you get a warning and your account is temporarily locked).  

    Now, I should point out that even a moderately successful podcast can get those kinds of numbers (as I did back in August), and so now I can’t use Dropbox to host podcasts. I should point out that you can pay to upgrade Dropbox storage (from 2+ GB free to 100+ GB) and bandwidth limits (to 200 GB), but that still only gives you 4000 downloads per day. Now, I may never get to that point, but having a file host that will disconnect your account automatically after only 1 warning if you become too successful is just a terrible way to do business, and there is no way to up your limit after that, for any price.

    Up next I tried Google Drive

    While getting a link to download files in Google Drive is a little bit harder than it needs to be, this seemed to be a pretty good system for hosting files. You get 15 GB of free storage, and you can pay only $1.99 more per month to get 100 GB of storage. The problem here comes again when you try to share these files. In the case of Google Drive, you don’t get cut off at a certain size of file, but rather when you hit 30 downloads of a file. This limit isn’t posted anywhere, and so when I switched from Dropbox in August, for the first morning all seemed well, but by that afternoon the downloads had stopped, and I had to scramble to try to find a solution. Google Drive is great in a LOT of ways, but it doesn’t work for podcast hosting.

    That day brought me to discovering Archive.org.

    Today is September 18th, 2014, but it shall be known to me as the day that Archive.org just stopped working. For about a month, all of my audio files were totally fine at archive.org. They make it really easy to add files in bulk, so even switching ~50 URLs wasn’t very hard. And then today, all of a sudden, it just stopped working. None of the links work at all, including the one for the podcast I uploaded on Tuesday night and posted this morning. It has been this way for about 8 hours, leaving me again scrambling to post a Dropbox link to the file while I find another file host that will store my file without all of the issues I talk about above.

    Today (September 18, 2014)

    Here is where the story pauses, because we are at today. I have been using OneDrive, the Microsoft-powered file service, for about 3 hours. It seems to be holding well, and so perhaps I will be able to follow up with some good news soon. I will say, right off the bat, OneDrive doesn’t make it easy to get a direct link to a file, like Archive.org or Dropbox do, but it working once you have the link is the most important thing to me at this point. And it’s possible that Archive.org will start working again and all will be well, but it will be hard for me to take that chance after today.

    On that note, I am definitely looking into hosting my files elsewhere for money (such as SoundCloud), but that costs $150 per year, so I will need to find sponsors and/or funding to make that happen.

    Thanks again for reading guys, and wish me luck with Archive.org!

    *Does North Korea have YouTube, I imagine not…
    **This is a guess, it REALLY depends on quality and bitrate.

  • Self-Improvement

    Self-Improvement

    I’m going to talk to you today about self-improvement. As somebody who makes a lot of stuff and then puts it on the Internet, it is very easy for me to look through my “back catalogue” and see that the thing I did two months ago is just TERRIBLE. I can’t even bother comparing my 8-week old project to the one I just finished, because they are on completely different levels. Take, for instance, a recent episode of Future Tech Chat:

    Now, compare that live video to one from April:
    I “accidentally” listened to the older one last night, and it is absolutely painful for me to compare the first minute of the two shows. Now, don’t even bother comparing the two title cards, as I have recently redesigned them to look consistent and clean, but not in a boring way. I’m just talking about my tone, my purposefulness, and my preparedness in starting the two episodes. I was actually probably a little more excited to talk about wearable devices than I was about bicycles, but it’s no contest if you ask me which is the better introduction to a show.
    Honestly, what comparing my present self to past versions of me has shown time and again is that if I keep putting effort into improving myself, eventually the bicycles episode will seem just as terrible as the wearables episode does now. I can only improve by continuing to try. The guys over at +AsapSCIENCE, (a GREAT YouTube channel in case you were wondering) made a little video about their first upload this week, and they felt exactly the same way I do.


    So, where does that leave me? Basically, I will keep working every single day to get better and to feel more comfortable doing the work I do.

    I know I’m kind of burying the lede on this one, but frankly I’m a little nervous about asking people to help me out and to continue to improve. I’ve created a profile on a creative support (aka crowdfunding) platform called Patreon, with absolutely no expectations as to where it will go or how much it will help me. I will continue in earnest with all the projects I’ve already been working on (I’m so lucky that basically everything I do on the Google platform is effectively free), but having some funds available will enable the technology I work with to improve, and I’ve tried to include some perks that will encourage you to help me out. The Patreon funding model is either on a per-project, or per-month basis, but I’m told that you can make a donation for a month and then simply cancel your subscription and support me in a small, lump sum kind of way. Honestly, any positives the use of this platform gets me are more than I’m expecting. You can find me on Patreon at the link below, and thank you to all of you who are already supporting me by sharing my work and chatting about important or mundane things with me on a regular basis, it means more than I can possibly tell you. I would also welcome other methods of support, financial or otherwise, if you’re skeptical about crowdfunding but would still like to help. I just really want to keep making stuff.

  • Push vs. Pull

    Push vs. Pull

    For those of you who don’t know, I have been sharing videos back and forth with my sister on YouTube since the end of March of this year. Our YouTube channel is called +Attrell Update, and I bring it up for two reasons, maybe even three (we’ll see how far I get).

    Point 1: Push vs. pull updating

    First, and most importantly, I have found the experience of making videos with my sister as the intended audience REALLY makes it a lot easier to share cool stuff I learn or know on the internet. The videos are for everybody, and it has the added bonus of letting both of us share what we know with eachother even though we live 4000 km apart (and she was even further away in France until June). The crazy thing to me, though, is that I am learning what people like, and what people are interested in. I have taken to spreading news about my own life in these videos and only telling maybe 1-2 other people offline. The result is that I get a good view of who is paying attention to what I’m doing online. The fact that only a millionth of one percent of people on Earth apparently care what I have to talk about on a weekly basis doesn’t surprise me, but I’m just getting started!

    The bigger point of all of this is that our world (at least when I was growing up) was a pull-based society. What I mean by that is that when the internet first really started to take hold socially, if you wanted to see something online, you went to a website and looked at it. There were sites and RSS readers (like the now-defunct Google Reader) that would gather and sometimes organize your personal reading list, but for the most part you had to go to the internet and PULL things off to see/read/watch/listen to. Now, in 2014, with the world faces glued endlessly to their phone screens, we are being trained to wait for content to be PUSHed to us. As somebody who is trying various different media ventures to see what sticks (+Future Chat, Ottawhat? Podcast, the aforementioned +Attrell Update, working on web design and video production for +Sons of Pluto) just to name a few, this PUSHing is really annoying to deal with, because there are people in my life who are interested in what I’m working on who might not be as technologically savvy as me, and they actually have difficulty finding out when things I’m doing are available to be consumed.

    As somebody who is trying to do a LOT with media, but who is so far without external funding (and doing as much as I can for free), this is pretty disheartening.

    Point 2: Commitment

    This brings me to the second point, which is about the nature of humans to look for patterns. Since starting the ventures I mentioned above, I have been doing everything in my power to work under a paradigm where people can EXPECT updates to arrive at a certain time. For instance:
    • Ottawhat: Released every week on Thursday AM.
    • Attrell Update: Steph (my sister) releases a video on Monday (previously Wednesday), I make one on Thursday (previously Friday).
    • Future Chat: New live episode every Saturday at 12:30 PM.
    Now, there is no “punishment” or losing my job if any of these things don’t happen, but since the inception of all of the above projects, I haven’t missed a week yet. But even still, I haven’t crossed the personal threshold of converting any of these to content I post because anybody expects them. While I say that people can expect episodes on the days described above, nobody has any stake in the successes of the projects, not even me. I have a job that I work 9-5 (actually 7-3), and so if all of these endeavors fizzle out, or never gain any audience, I won’t really have lost anything. 
    The unfortunate thing about THAT is that because the stakes are so low, it actually makes it easier to not take these projects seriously, even for myself. But I do want to take them seriously, but I actually find it very rewarding to put all of this effort into doing things I love, and what I love is writing, producing, and every aspect of the science and technology fields. It would be a dream come true if I could earn a living income learning about science and tech, and I would gladly put in more than 40 hours a week (and I do) to see these tasks through. 
    I’ve considered the possibility of crowd-funding or seeking advertisers for some of these projects, but as of yet I’ve done everything I can to fund these goals either by learning how to do something myself for free, or by using my technical savvy to solve problems with the help of free online services. My ultimate “first-step” goal would be to purchase a camcorder, my combination of mid-range webcam and DSLR woefully under-deliver where I need them most for ongoing projects.
    Please drop me a line if you think this is a good idea, I think having other people (and especially strangers) put a stake in my success would really light a fire under me to be sure I see my goals through. That being said, either way I do intend to get a camcorder once I can be assured my outstanding student debt can be paid off in a reasonable amount of time.

    Point #3: My Ultimate Goal

    I think that at the intersection of science and technology, there is something powerful that drives world progress, and that is why my work in those fields is so important to me personally. The self-correcting nature of science and the way rationality and logic prevail in the scientific domains really draw me to them as a way to solve the ills of the world. Through discussion of innovative technology and using science in new and creative ways, we can really make changing the world as easy as possible.
    In essence, what I’m trying to do is get experience talking about science and technology, and creating opportunities for myself to get my name out there talking about what I love. In terms of the percentage of world population, it is a really great time to be alive. My role models are people who have broken through the barrier of only reaching a small audience, and who use their public platforms to fight inequality in the world. Issues like sex and gender discrimination, income inequality, infectious disease, institutional racism and a culture of glorified violence are just a few of the divisive topics whose handling by our culture will define those alive today in the history books. 
    If I can play even a small part in bringing the world up to a minimum humane level of treatment of all the people on Earth, I will have accomplished my goals.
  • The World’s Most Honest Cover Letter

    The World’s Most Honest Cover Letter

    I really despise writing cover letters in 2014. For online applications, they are worse than useless. If you already know the person doing the hiring, or have a reference/connection, they are probably not even read. If you don’t already know the person, you have NO idea what to say that might compel a complete stranger who has never heard of you to want to talk to you more, least of all by spouting platitudes.

    Here is what I wish I could write every time somebody says “Why do you think you’d be a good fit for XYZ company?”:

    Why do you want to work for XYZ Company, and why do you think you would be a good fit?

    Well, right now, I don’t have a job, or perhaps I’m unhappy with my current job. Either way, I want a different job. Unless you’re hiring me to write cover letters, I don’t see what possible benefit me writing this could give. This isn’t a job where I will be asked to write. Anyway, here goes.

    I post pretty much everything I do on social media or on my website at robattrell.com, which I designed myself by hand. It’s not amazing, but it gets the job done and gives me something to put on a business card. I’m pretty into technology, and so you can also find me on all the social networks by searching my name. Yes, I make jokes and post silly things on there sometimes, but I’m rarely, if ever, offensive. Please don’t hold that stuff against me.

    I’ve done web design, some programming, video production, podcasting, writing, and data analysis. I was a researcher at the University of Ottawa through the tail end of a bachelor’s degree and a Master’s in Chemistry, so I know my way around a chemistry lab, and I’ve mastered Microsoft Office.

    I’d love to do some work for you, I will work very hard at any task you give me, and I promise I will approach my work in a creative and interesting way. I might even see something you or your other employees missed from time to time. I’m pretty fun to talk to.

    So that’s me. If you are interested in hiring me, that’s cool. I do need to make a living. Otherwise, no hard feelings, I’m probably just not right for the job. I’ll find something.

    Thanks for your time,

    Rob Attrell

  • Who Am I…and What Can I Do?

    Who Am I…and What Can I Do?

    There is substantial scientific evidence showing that nature and nurture (ie. genetics and environment) both play an important role in determining our personality, intelligence, and our tastes as adults. That being said, I thought it would be interesting for me (and hopefully for you) to look back at where I came from, and how it shaped me into who I am today.

    I have spent the vast majority of my life not taking things seriously…

    My parents were excellent role models who guided me gently through childhood and adolescence. I was always taught that nothing was out of my reach if I really wanted it badly enough. My mom and dad also showed me that there is a time to push and show what is really important (like eating stupid vegetables), and times when it probably doesn’t matter so much (like eating spicy food). It was always very important to my parents that I take responsibility for my own decisions, from a very early age. I enjoyed the freedom this afforded me, and it also taught me a lot of very valuable life decisions.

    I have spent the vast majority of my life (if not all of it) with not taking things seriously as my default. There are obviously a few exceptions where things need to be taken seriously, but I find they fall few and far between. Instead, my experiences have shown me that having a good time is what’s most important in terms of living a fulfilling life. I’ve written previously about getting along well with people in life, and in especially relationships, as in a game of Hollywood Squares. Let a joke (even a stupid one) be a reason to smile, relax, and laugh a little. We’re all friends here.

    …little else can help you understand life better than a bit of satirical humour.

    My dad was probably the person who introduced me to sarcasm and satire, as well as to homage. I think I learned from him not to take anything too seriously, as the people you love and who love you back will forgive mistakes and accidents as a part of life. Growing up with TV like the Simpsons, with reruns on every night as a teenager, I learned that little else can help you understand life better than a bit of satirical humour. That idea has continued with me throughout my life, from the Office, to Parks and Recreation, to TV personalities like Stephen Colbert. There is no better way to learn about the intricacies of something than to have a great writer deconstruct it and make jokes at its expense.

    Mostly, what I have learned from my experiences living punchline to punchline, is that not taking life too seriously is one of the absolute best ways to avoid stress. While the rest of the world keeps on spinning and taking itself FAR too seriously, one of the best things you can do is sit back and laugh to yourself about how silly self-importance is. There are SO many very serious and extremely contentious issues on planet Earth to worry over, that an escape from that, even a brief one, is all I need to stay grounded.

    Or maybe I’m wrong.

    I wonder pretty often whether the world we live in now is going to be the final reality, in terms of science, geopolitics, religion, climate, technology, language, behaviour, communication. It seems to me that it is almost impossible that that would be the case, seeing as how things have changed and been updated so frequently in the far and recent pasts that it has probably been said and recorded throughout history that things will remain the way they are and that we have basically arrived
    at humanity’s endpoint. Or maybe I’m wrong. Maybe this is essentially as good as it’s going to get, and we should all start learning quantum mechanics because it affords us an understanding of the way the entire universe works (although dark matter and energy would suggest that our current understanding probably isn’t even near complete).

    Any way you look at it, even in our most peaceful years as a species on Earth, there are still terrible things going on all around the world. There are an estimated 25 million people in the world who are basically considered slaves right at this moment, because of low or no pay and abhorrent working conditions. At least 50% of the North American population is dealing with subjugation, sexism, homophobia, human and civil rights violations, inequality, ignorance, abuse, violence, war, and innumerable other problems. In the rest of the world the percentages are much higher than that.

    …pay a little more attention to “funny” people…

    We have the ability as a society to right these inequalities. We have the technology to cure most diseases, we can generate enough renewable energy to power our world several times over if we sat down and hashed out the details. We could severely limit the power and motive of individuals to commit violent acts if we simply did away with outdated prejudices and assault weapons, and stopped abusing belief systems to prop up atrociously unfair political systems. Humans’ ability to stop these injustices exist right now, and the people doing the most to expose these systems for what they are are the satirists who unravel the complexities of everyday occurrences and use humour to inform and to make us aware of what is going on.

    Therefore, I move that we all pay a little more attention to “funny” people, because you have the most to learn from somebody who is lightheartedly trying to show you how wrong the world is. Short of visiting everyone in the world to see that we’re not so different, this is probably the best thing you can do to make the world a better place.

  • Friends in a Digital World

    Friends in a Digital World

    I’ve been told throughout my life that I don’t have many friends. I’m certainly not one to mind being characterized in that way, but I started wondering if that is actually true, or even if there is a tiny bit of truth to a statement of that nature.

    I’m sure there are lots of people in my neighbourhood, in Ottawa, in Canada, and in the world who have a fear or open dislike of personal or social interactions in one form or another. I wouldn’t say that my thoughts go that far, but I can say with almost complete assurance that I often find menial social interactions (small talk, etc.) unnecessary, to the point that I would rather say nothing in some social situations than to try to pointlessly fill time with chit-chat with anybody I have nothing in common with.

    (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

    I am much more comfortable in social interactions with only one or two other people. Perhaps this means I’m on the very low end of the autism spectrum, who knows. When I am in larger groups, I tend to stick to engaging in conversations with the people I already know than to branch out and meet new people. It doesn’t help that I know I have a bad habit of trying to pay attention to conversation and immediately forgetting people’s names as I am introduced to them. Having said that, it’s worth noting that a lot of the things I find pleasurable (obscure TV shows, a majority of pop music, web design, video production, writing, science and learning, etc.) are things that I don’t have in common with most people, and so I find it easier to keep them to myself than to bring them up in conversation or to try to get to know new people.


    (function(d, s, id) { var js, fjs = d.getElementsByTagName(s)[0]; if (d.getElementById(id)) return; js = d.createElement(s); js.id = id; js.src = “//connect.facebook.net/en_US/all.js#xfbml=1”; fjs.parentNode.insertBefore(js, fjs); }(document, ‘script’, ‘facebook-jssdk’));

    In fact, a good majority of the people I encounter in my day-to-day life are what I would consider acquaintances, and are not friends by most strict definitions. I don’t really know too much about what is going on in their lives, and they don’t really know much about me outside of the time we spend together (in sports, work, leisure, etc.).

    That brings me around to the main point of writing this. With social networks like Facebook, Twitter, Google+, YouTube, etc., etc., etc., what does it mean to be friends with somebody?

    I have a strong feeling in my gut that when I let someones friendship request on Facebook sit “pending”, it affects my relationship with that person. Most people I talk to would see it as a slap in the face if I don’t accept their “friendship” immediately, and this is such a tightly engrained part of the human condition that there is literally a stigma associated with “un-friending” somebody on Facebook.

    Personally, I don’t use Facebook’s friends list feature as a measure of my association with a person. I know plenty of people I see regularly and spend time with who I have never considered being “friends” with, and all of my current “friends” are really only grandfathered in since I started to allow people to follow my Facebook feed without actually being my friend (something Facebook allowed starting in 2012, like Google+). Since I use Facebook to post updates publicly, like Twitter (you have the choice of your audience every time you post something, like Google+) I don’t actually need the concept of “friends” on Facebook, and in fact I don’t use Facebook that way.

    If not for Facebook Messenger (which will apparently start indexing the contents of your private messages now, so there’s that) I wouldn’t use Facebook at all, but I still don’t want to alienate people. I post all kinds of content on Google+, YouTube, Facebook, Twitter, on this blog, and across the internet in 100s of places. If you want to see what I’m doing on the Internet, or send me a message via IM, email, video chat, anything, you are free to do so. Please don’t think that my not accepting your “friend request” on Facebook means that I don’t want to interact with you online, or that I don’t want to get to know you better. I just think there are better ways to keep my digital life and social connections organized, and you’re welcome to follow me (sending me a friend request also automatically subscribes you to what I post on Facebook), and if you have followers enabled (from the link) maybe I’ll follow you back. Send me a message on Hangouts at +Rob Attrell.

    If we’re friends in real life, that can be enough. We don’t need to prove it on Facebook.

    I have more to say on real life vs. digital friendships, but I’ll save it for another day.
    While you’re at it, don’t forget to check out the latest video on my new YouTube Channel, +Attrell Update! Hope you like it!

  • We Are The Future

    We Are The Future

    I have written before on the idea that we can all learn very important life lessons from our parents, and how it is important to let our elders influence and shape our relationships and understanding of the world. I made the argument here that there is no real need to take what our role models say or do to be the right thing on faith alone, but that their teachings should be adapted to fit our own experiences and the changing world we live in. Just because something has been done unquestioningly for a period of time doesn’t mean that it is the be all and end all, de facto way of doing something. As is often the case, the so called “old ways” tend to be upheld by conservative thinkers, simply because it is the way they have always known.

    The particular reason I decided to write this piece came when I was watching the episode of the Office in Season 6 when Pam and Jim are getting married. This is one of my favourite episodes, and the montage with the cast dancing down the aisle to “Forever” cut with Jim and Pam electing to be privately married in the spray of Niagara Falls by the ship captain should have won awards for its tear-jerking quality. Anyhow, this part of the episode is not what caught my attention. I should point out, before I get too much further, that I have watched this episode at least 7-8 times since it aired 3 years ago. However, it was not until this most recent viewing that I actually picked up on how strange the particular scene I will describe unfolds. I think the reason for this might just be the point I’m at right now in my life, where these are things I think about on a day to day basis. It is certainly possible that this scene is actually only strange to me, in that I have never experienced anything like it in my life, and I hope that when I die I can say that I will have never experienced it.

    A major plot point in the beginning of the episode is that Pam’s grandmother (henceforth referred to as Mema) is to be kept unaware of the fact that Pam and Jim are living together premaritally, and that Pam is in fact several months pregnant (the main reason the wedding is taking place when it is, though they are soul-mates and could get married in a sewer, or on Mars and things would still work out). The members of the Office are told that Mema is very old-fashioned, and that for that reason, she is being kept in the dark, because she would surely disapprove.

    Of course, later in the episode it comes out during a toast that Pam is pregnant (strongly implying that she has engaged in premarital intercourse) and has been living with Jim for a period of several months. Mema decides that in light of this news, she is not going to attend the wedding, a source of panic in the episode. At this point in the story, Michael (Steve Carell) attempts to quell her emotions and convince her that its really not that big a deal. In the end, though it is never mentioned after this conversation, she is later seen at the ceremony. I expect that this scenario is not exactly how it would play out in reality, but for the sake of television they are forced to simplify the issue, as well as try to make it funny.

    I have personally never met anybody who I would see as reacting this way to the lifestyle and habits of a family member, or anybody else, but as I understand there are many groups of people who would behave in a very similar manner, though would probably argue more vehemently and with much more conviction than this television scenario would have you believe.

    Now, I don’t think this is necessarily a religious argument, but I can see it breaking down into one. Personally, I know many people who have no apparent problem with living together without being married. This can be said of people who make religion a big part of their lives, just as much as it can for people who are actively non-religious, so in my mind it really comes down to morality, which is guided by religion but doesn’t necessarily strictly follow it. I should point out for completeness that I personally have no issue whatsoever with people who wish to live together before getting married, or even who wish to live with a significant other even if there are no immediate plans to marry that person. I see it as a matter of convenience, both in terms of being able to spend time with that person, and in terms of sharing living costs. It stands to reason that two people who wish to spend such a large amount of personal time and space with another person would want to at least make sure they were doing it with someone compatible before making it “permanent”.

    Now, on to the pressing issue of how this relates back to me. I have not actually discussed the issue of cohabitation before or after marriage with my parents or any other family members, but I would be keen to get their views on this issue. I don’t really see any members of my family (living or deceased) having any moral issue with my living with a significant other premaritally. Frankly, if they did have a problem with it (strictly on moral grounds of course, if the person in question is terrible, or a drug dealer, or a delinquent they should certainly be voicing their concerns) I expect that I would actually have a problem with them feeling that way. For example, if I was in the same situation as Jim or Pam, and found out that one of my family members wasn’t attending my wedding on this grounds, I don’t think it would bother me in the slightest. I think I would be disconcerted that someone who I know and love felt this way, and chose to protest my life by boycotting part or all of it. I would be glad to be an agent of change towards open-mindedness in a world of staunchly opposed views.

    We are told that children are the future, and I think that still applies no matter how old you are. It is up to the newest generation to be open to the personal choices of people around them. It is akin in modern society to a family disowning a member of it because of their sexual orientation. It isn’t right, and nobody should have to justify their choices to anybody, much less the people they are closest to, just because traditionally it was frowned upon.

    The bottom line, as I see it, is that people should be allowed to make decisions that are in their best interest, and the least of their worries should be morality police telling them that they are morally bankrupt for trying to be happy. I am just glad that the people I choose to associate myself with all seem to follow this policy.

    Edit: This is a real site: http://www.halpertbeesly.com/

  • Everything I know, I was taught in graduate school.

    In my time as an unemployed human, I have learned a lot about myself. I have likes and dislikes, just as everyone does. For example, I know that I like being employed, and I don’t like looking for a job. At the start of the summer, I didn’t realize that I liked being employed as much as I did. Having a reason to be up and out of bed is a very satisfying feeling. As it stands right now, most days if I didn’t get up, nobody would even notice for most of the day. While this sounds like a dream for most, having it go on for more than a few weeks is actually quite demoralizing. Having a task, or several, to accomplish over a series of days, weeks, or months is wonderfully fulfilling. Generally speaking, I could very easily come up with a long list of things that could occupy my time for years on end and would be incredibly rewarding, but given the nature of our modern society, this just isn’t realistic. I would run out of money within a month or two, given that I am already massively in debt.

    Speaking of debt, another thing I have learned about myself, and perhaps about the nature of modern society itself, is that indoctrination into our scholastic system is certainly one of the most important steps in a young or medium person’s life. From a very young age, one most of us certainly cannot recollect, we are put into groups of like-aged and like-parented small people with babysitters who have been trained to imprint upon us a certain manner of absorbing knowledge and vast quantities of information no single person could ever be expected to recall past adolescence (if you don’t believe me, watch Are You Smarter Than A 5th Grader). It is also expected that during this time we interact with these like-aged individuals, for no other reason than that it will serve us well later in life to be able to converse reasonably with people we have never met (though some people you meet throughout the day will make you strongly doubt that they are capable of reason, or intelligence). Teachers, especially those who decide to mould these young minds, are incredibly important to our continued development as a species. Certainly it is ideal that parents can work during the day, and that their children aren’t simply left to roam the streets, which was certainly the origin of schools. More importantly though, teachers are expected to be able to teach their pupils the things that their parents learned in school, but either don’t have time to pass along to them, or don’t remember well enough to be able to pass on.

    From a very young age, I was told that I had a lot of potential. Parents, teachers, principals, many older people I met would impart this idea of potential on to me. I still don’t really know why they said that to me, because it gave me a false sense that everything would be alright, and that if I didn’t close any metaphorical doors in my life, I would be able to do whatever I wanted and everything would work out just fine. Truth be told, I still actually believe this is true, if I wanted the status quo, I could have it and be very successful. The jobs I aspire to, doctor, astronaut, nuclear scientist, these are all absolutely goals I am capable of achieving if I apply myself to the task and get a little bit lucky. However, for them to become reality, combined with the way I spent the last 6 years of my life, would take tens of thousands of dollars and probably at least half a decade. This is time and money I simply don’t have, already being in debt and 24 years old.

    The problem, and the main reason I am way past those dreams, starts at the age of 18. I had unlimited potential, and I had (still have) a instinctual curiosity for science. The idea trying to be smarter than somebody else in a competitive sense did not appeal to me in the slightest, and so I had no desire to apply to medical or law school at that time, even though practising in either of those fields would have been incredible. In a hopefully humble-sounding way, I like to think that I have a higher-than-average capacity for absorbing and processing information and external stimuli. Given that, with my love of science and reason, taking chemistry at a post-secondary level seemed like a really great idea. Everybody I had ever spoken to, other than chemistry teachers, absolutely detested chemistry, or at the very least enjoyed the subject matter but found that they were terrible at performing experiments or grasping the associated concepts. This would be a prestigious choice of degree which would have very little competition, where I would be free to learn without external pressure and where average or slightly above average grades would allow me to sail through the program. After all, my entire scholastic career had been about learning, and being perfect had never really appealed to me if I understood the material. This is a phrase I have repeated ad nauseum, almost as an excuse, to anybody who suggested that the discrepancy between my grades, and the grades I was expected to have based on my apparent intelligence, was of concern to me.

    The truth is, as I considered this summer applying to medical school for next year, I really think I could be a doctor, or astronaut, or lawyer. Given the requisite training in these professions, I am sure I could cure, or space, or law, wonderfully. But this just isn’t the case in our modern society. There is a very well-defined path for absolutely everyone who wants to be more than anything. By that, I mean that anybody who is able bodied could be a garbageman, or dishwasher, or cashier. These things are not difficult, but as we have all certainly seen at one point or another, it is possible to be terrible, or to excel at any of those jobs. Growing up, I saw people who were good at things, and people who were absolutely hopeless. From this, I surmised that if I was able to work hard for 6 years at something that most everyone considered extremely difficult, that anyone capable of basic factual analysis would see that I was capable of doing, or at least learning to do, most anything.

    I thought I had figured out the way the world works, and that if I was able to earn a Masters in Chemistry, that it would qualify me for any job that was considered to be less intellectually rigorous than that. The logic of that statement still resonates with me to this day, and I still ultimately believe it to be accurate. Very little of what I did over the course of the 4 year undergraduate degree or one year of masters required any specific skills that I feel nobody else is capable of given similar instruction. Some intellectual constructs and theoretical concepts, as well as a lot of the mathematics associated with those topics, is beyond the reach of most ordinary people, but those people are more than likely completely fine with that. Additionally, there are also many concepts and associated mathematics which are well beyond my mental grasp, though I know people who frolic through those fields of expressions and equations like a meadow of daffodils.

    The basic idea of this notion is that once I have learned all that is known thus far (and a little more) about the NMR of halogens, and prepared a 133 page document summarizing that knowledge, I should be able to walk into a meeting with someone, show them what I am capable of learning to do, and immediately begin learning to do what they need of me. In exchange, they would make an allowance available to me consisting of enough money to pay off my loans in some haste, and to acquire a modest house, car and the like in a matter of years. I am confident that if given that opportunity, I could pleasantly surprise someone with my capacity for learning.

    However, what I have found of society is quite a bit different. After completing the above document showing that I am capable of learning about *murmur murmur blurb*, I am qualified to continue to do that exact thing in other buildings, or possibly to manage the facility that exact thing happens in, or even to teach that exact thing, and what I learned to be able to learn that thing, but not in an official professorial capacity, which would require 3 more years (at least) of doing that exact thing.

    I never really wanted the body of my life’s work to consist of a continuation of the work of the person who took a risk on me and allowed me to learn in a space he had worked very hard to claim at a university to have students work for him, advancing a field which he and many others have a strong interest in. I am not saying that to take away from him, or from anyone in the lab, because post-secondary academia is a very proud, important profession that I wouldn’t want to take away from anybody. It just isn’t where I want to spend my time.

    While I was learning all about halogen NMR, I was completely enthralled by it. But there comes a point when there is nothing more any subject matter can do for you, and this happened to me midway through my graduate studies. The same thing happened when I was working in retail electronics at Canada Computers. I was mesmerized and blown away by the world of consumer and business electronics and computing, and soaked up information about it like a sponge. Being immersed in anything you don’t fully comprehend but long to know holds a certain fascination for me. But, after about 6 months, at which point I started to see patterns in the consumer world and in electronics, the entire store which had held so much pleasure for me while I was learning about it was suddenly completely flat and predictable, and I got bored faster than a tree at a saw mill, or Timon at a Pumbaa convention, or a lake at an ice fishing convention (these are going downhill fast). While I never completely lost my interest in chemistry (or even NMR specifically), academia doesn’t appeal to me as a place to spend the rest of my life. Similarly, while I will still follow the capacity and speed doubling of RAM, CPU speeds and cores, and flash memory, now that I know it is inevitable, it does not pique my acute interest in the way it once did. Even entering chemistry in my teens, it was always my dream to work in a lab, researching interesting and new practical applications of cutting-edge technology, to put it to use in a meaningful and productive way in the world.

    The truth is, though, as I am coming to realize, is that this is just not possible for me specifically, without some help, and perhaps some luck. I need to get in front of people with enough clout to actually make that happen, and show them what I am capable of, given the opportunity and resources. If I can show someone with the ability to make those kinds of things happen what I can do, I’m sure I can surprise even myself with what I can achieve.

    In the end, I want what we all eventually want, to meet someone, or a group of people, that can be counted on to notice that we are awake and out of bed, and to share my life (space and time, which is really all we have) with them in the pursuit of contentedness. And to have a meaningful, positive impact on the world. Happiness is just a nice bonus.

    To summarize, I have learned a great deal about a wealth of different subjects in my time on this Earth, and I am itching to apply that, and give a little back to the world that gave me so much. But first I have to get past the sad misconception that I only know what I learned in graduate school.